<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>City of Johannesburg Archives - ProtectionWeb</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/tag/city-of-johannesburg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/tag/city-of-johannesburg/</link>
	<description>First with Security News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 15:44:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-ZA</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>City of Joburg abandons CCTV bylaw</title>
		<link>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/civil-security/city-of-joburg-abandons-cctv-bylaw/</link>
					<comments>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/civil-security/city-of-joburg-abandons-cctv-bylaw/#disqus_thread</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of Johannesburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannesburg]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protectionweb.co.za/?p=98535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The City of Johannesburg council has formally repealed the by-law that extended the City’s control over residents’ private CCTV cameras. The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) welcomed the City’s decision to repeal what it said was a controversial by-law. This comes after OUTA and the South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA) both launched legal challenges [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/civil-security/city-of-joburg-abandons-cctv-bylaw/">City of Joburg abandons CCTV bylaw</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The City of Johannesburg council has formally repealed the by-law that extended the City’s control over residents’ private CCTV cameras.</p>
<p>The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) welcomed the City’s decision to repeal what it said was a controversial by-law. This comes after OUTA and the South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA) both launched legal challenges to stop the by-law from taking effect.</p>
<p>The by-law, passed by the City’s council meeting on 21 February 2025, would have forced property owners who installed private CCTV (closed-circuit TV) cameras to register with the metro police and pay annual fees, effectively taxing law-abiding residents for protecting their own safety.</p>
<p>The by-law was the Privately-Owned Closed-Circuit Television Surveillance Camera By Law, and it forced individuals and businesses to register their cameras, pay fees, provide plans, get sign-off from engineers, and blocked owners from sharing footage themselves but required City access to footage. In July 2025, both OUTA and SAPOA launched legal challenges against the by-law, warning the City that the by-law infringed on residents’ rights and added red tape without improving public safety.</p>
<p>The City is reported to have repealed the by-law at its council meeting on 2 September.</p>
<p>OUTA will not proceed with its legal action but will seek costs, formalised as an order of court, as the City chose to fight instead of heeding calls to repeal earlier.</p>
<p>“Repealing this bylaw is a victory for common sense. It was never about public safety – it was about squeezing law-abiding residents for more money,” said Advocate Stefanie Fick, OUTA’s Executive Director of Accountability.</p>
<p>“It should not take a court case to force the City to do the right thing. Leaders should listen to their residents before passing laws that make life harder.”</p>
<p>The City of Joburg council would serve residents far better by focusing on fixing decaying infrastructure and service delivery rather than dreaming up new ways to extract money from people already burdened by high rates and failing services, OUTA said.</p>
<p>“Why this bylaw was passed in the first place remains a mystery: was it incompetence, arrogance in thinking residents wouldn’t notice, or a desperate attempt to raise funds? Either way, it highlights the need for better leadership – leaders who put Joburg residents ahead of their own pockets,” said Fick.</p>
<p>“This outcome is a reminder that civil society plays a critical role in holding government to account when governance fails. OUTA recognises SAPOA’s parallel legal challenge as another crucial piece of the pressure that brought about this result. Joburg deserves leaders who focus on service delivery, not schemes to milk residents,” OUTA added.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/civil-security/city-of-joburg-abandons-cctv-bylaw/">City of Joburg abandons CCTV bylaw</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/civil-security/city-of-joburg-abandons-cctv-bylaw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police the City of Joburg, not our CCTV cameras</title>
		<link>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/uncategorised/police-the-city-of-joburg-not-our-cctv-cameras/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricardo Teixeira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 07:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of Johannesburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protectionweb.co.za/?p=98197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) is going to court to challenge the legality of the City of Johannesburg (COJ) new by-law on privately owned closed-circuit television cameras (CCTV), which sets up convoluted rules requiring registration and City access to private data. OUTA’s case is against the City of Johannesburg, and the City’s municipal manager [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/uncategorised/police-the-city-of-joburg-not-our-cctv-cameras/">Police the City of Joburg, not our CCTV cameras</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span data-ogsc="" data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody">The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) is going to court to challenge the legality of the City of Johannesburg (COJ) new by-law on privately owned closed-circuit television cameras (CCTV), which sets up convoluted rules requiring registration and City access to private data.</p>
<p>OUTA’s case is against the City of Johannesburg, and the City’s municipal manager and mayor, and was filed in the Johannesburg High Court on 18 June. Currently the acting municipal manager is Tshepo Makola (since 17 January 2025) and the mayor is Dada Morero (since 16 August 2024). The papers have been served, and OUTA is awaiting an indication of whether the City intends to oppose the action.</p>
<p>The notice of motion calls for the court to declare the City’s <em data-ogsc="">Privately-Owned Closed-Circuit Television Surveillance Camera By Law</em> invalid and unconstitutional, and set it aside. It also calls for the City to provide the records relating to the public participation, adoption and promulgation of the by-law.</p>
<p>This by-law was passed by the City council on 21 February 2025, with the meeting minutes showing support from 15 parties (including the ANC, ActionSA, EFF and PA) and dissent by two parties (the DA and ACDP).</p>
<p>OUTA believes that the by-law is convoluted, irrational, places unreasonable burdens on private businesses and residents, raises privacy concerns, and is unworkable.</p>
<p><strong data-ogsc="">OUTA’s founding affidavit</strong></p>
<p>OUTA’s founding affidavit is by Advocate Stefanie Fick, OUTA Executive Director for the Accountability Division.</p>
<p>Fick says that OUTA wants the by-law overturned due to:</span></p>
<ul data-ogsc="">
<li data-ogsc=""><span data-ogsc="">Lack of public participation;</span></li>
<li data-ogsc=""><span data-ogsc="">Conflict with section 156 of the Constitution regarding the powers of municipalities;</span></li>
<li data-ogsc=""><span data-ogsc="">Lack of rationality;</span></li>
<li data-ogsc=""><span data-ogsc="">Infringement of the constitutional rights to property (section 25 of the Constitution), privacy (s14), and freedom and security (s12).</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span data-ogsc="">Fick says the public participation process is essential, and calls for the by-law to be declared invalid “for want of sufficient public participation”.</p>
<p>“Given the extent and impact of the By-Law, it appears that limited public participation took place, alternatively, that there was insufficient community participation,” says Fick.</p>
<p>OUTA questions the legality of the by-law, arguing that the City’s powers are limited by the Constitution and the South African Police Services Act, and these do not appear to allow a municipality to exercise direct authority over private property such as privately owned CCTV cameras. “The COJ may regulate its own CCTV camera systems as it deems fit, but it exceeds its powers by directly interfering with private property rights,” says Fick.</p>
<p>“It would appear that the COJ is usurping policing functions by commandeering private CCTV camera systems aimed at ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities and property within the City, which safety and security responsibility is primarily the function of National and Provincial Government. For this reason, the COJ is overstepping its executive and legislative authority.”</p>
<p>OUTA says the City’s registration process is irrational, cumbersome and unimplementable.</p>
<p>The by-law requires “prior written approval” from the City for installing, using or upgrading CCTV cameras which include coverage of public space, to provide the City with plans and motivations for such cameras, get sign-off from a registered engineer, reapply each year, and pay fees to the City. It also allows the City to simply confiscate without a court order any equipment it deems to have overstepped the by-law.</p>
<p>The by-law also requires that each CCTV camera must record and store data for a minimum period but this is incoherently stated and effectively outlaws cameras that provide only real-time monitoring.</p>
<p>The by-law blocks sharing of data with community policing forums or private security companies, restricting it to use by the SAPS and Johannesburg Metro Police Department (JMPD) only.</p>
<p>CCTV cameras must carry labels with owners’ names and contact details, which creates privacy issues.</p>
<p>There are additional restrictions for commercial applicants.</p>
<p>Fick calls the demand for fees “nothing more than a scheme to secure additional revenue for the COJ, which is financially crippled”, and a double tax for owners who have already paid VAT and probably import duties on their CCTV equipment.</p>
<p>OUTA believes this by-law will undermine community safety initiatives, which means the by-law will effectively have the opposite effect of what is intended.</p>
<p>The by-law appears to grant City officials the right to enter private property at any time to inspect the cameras, which is an invasion of privacy and open to abuse.</p>
<p>Threats to confiscate unregistered cameras or those of which the City does not approve would be arbitrary deprivation or expropriation without compensation, says OUTA.</p>
<p>The requirement that owners must simply hand over all data is unnecessary, as “far less intrusive alternatives” already exist in law, including the subpoena system for investigation and prosecution, or simply asking CCTV owners for help.</p>
<p>The registration requirements raise concerns over privacy, and the City’s handling of data and potential for misuse. If the City takes all footage with access to public space, it follows that much of that footage will also include images of private space. “What a person does within the boundaries of his property is private, and the COJ must not intrude on this privacy,” says Fick.</p>
<p>The by-law is unimplementable, and will not improve security.</p>
<p>“The exercise of public power must be rational and logically connected to the intended purpose,” says Fick. “It is contended that there is no rationality between the purpose and object of the act and the unreasonable burdens imposed on a CCTV owner.  Placing an enormous administrative burden on a CCTV owner would discourage residents from installing CCTV camera systems. The net result would be a community increasingly exposed to crime, where the SAPS and JMPD are not equipped to effectively deal with the scourge of pervasive crime.”</span></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/uncategorised/police-the-city-of-joburg-not-our-cctv-cameras/">Police the City of Joburg, not our CCTV cameras</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collaboration is key to eradicating crime &#8211; Vumacam COO Michael Varney</title>
		<link>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/industry/collaboration-is-key-to-eradicating-crime-vumacam-coo-michael-varney/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricardo Teixeira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 10:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securex 2024]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of Johannesburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SafeCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vumacam]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protectionweb.co.za/?p=96847</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Vumacam, a leader in advanced surveillance technology, is revolutionising public safety through its extensive network of cameras and its strategic partnerships with both the public and private sectors. Michael Varney, the company’s Chief Operations Officer sat down with ProtectionWeb to discuss some of the company’s successes and future plans. Varney explains that Vumacam’s network consists [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/industry/collaboration-is-key-to-eradicating-crime-vumacam-coo-michael-varney/">Collaboration is key to eradicating crime &#8211; Vumacam COO Michael Varney</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vumacam, a leader in advanced surveillance technology, is revolutionising public safety through its extensive network of cameras and its strategic partnerships with both the public and private sectors. Michael Varney, the company’s Chief Operations Officer sat down with ProtectionWeb to discuss some of the company’s successes and future plans.</p>
<p>Varney explains that Vumacam’s network consists of poles with two license plate recognition cameras and one overview camera per configuration. The configuration is adaptable, depending on whether the area has high vehicle or pedestrian traffic. Additionally, poles are integrated with solar panels and power management systems to ensure continuous operation.</p>
<p>One of Vumacam’s biggest advantages, is its partnership with sister companies. Vumacam is part of a large group, which includes Vumatel, Dark Fiber Africa, and other significant fibre operators, enabling efficient infrastructure deployment.</p>
<p>Currently Vumacam has 7 000 cameras in public spaces, primarily in the city of Johannesburg, with recent expansion into the Western Cape and ongoing opportunities in the Eastern Cape, Polokwane and Mpumalanga.</p>
<p>Having first partnered with the City of Johannesburg, Vumacam has grown its relationship with the public sector to include the Gauteng provincial government. Commenting on the partnership, Varney noted Vumacam enables the provincial government, “with the data that comes with our platform, they&#8217;re able to dispatch the SAPS, the Highway Patrol, Flying Squad, and the Crime Prevention Wardens.”</p>
<p>The platform has significantly improved response times, said Varney, reducing from 18 &#8211; 30 minutes to 5 &#8211; 10 minutes. This he said, is “because the data that we’re using is so accurate, you’re able to then pinpoint, verify the alert that comes in, and pinpoint exactly where those [necessary] resources need to be dispatched.”</p>
<p>Public-private partnerships have allowed for seamless data sharing and effective crime reduction, with private security companies providing backup for public law enforcement, and vice versa. Previously, when private security companies intersected with an incident, guards were left waiting for law enforcement to arrive to affect the necessary arrests. Now, Varney notes, Vumacam is “able to ensure that we can provide backup for each other,” with this being key to reducing crime.</p>
<p>“We understand that we can’t do it on our own, but the ability for the public sector and the private sector to be able to work together has been massive, and I think something that we&#8217;re probably most proud of,” said Varney.</p>
<p>Vumacam&#8217;s network has facilitated significant crime prevention initiatives, including the interception of vehicles of interest across different regions. The benefit of multiple parties loading data onto a shared platform means if a vehicle is loaded due to an incident in one area, and is picked up in another, nearby parties or authorities can be notified to intercept.</p>
<p>In such a scenario, responders are notified with more than just vehicle info, said Varney. The number of suspects spotted inside the vehicle, and the crime it is believed to be involved in, are some of the alerts that can be shared.</p>
<p>“So you know [if] it’s a violent offender, you can approach with caution. You know, don’t take a knife to a gunfight,” said Varney.</p>
<p>“Our secret sauce is that we allow all of our partners, everyone who has access to the network, to be allowed to load their vehicles, deliver their SOPs to their customers in their own way, but benefit of the crowd sourcing, so to speak, of everybody loading data, and that&#8217;s ultimately how you eradicate crime.”</p>
<p>Looking to future opportunities, Varney notes “our future is bright,” and stated Vumacam plans to densify a national network. “We want to continue to work with the with the industry itself, to grow the density of our of our camera network,” he added. Future modules for Vumacam’s platform will allow operators to track vehicles by make, model colour and specific identifying features.</p>
<p>“We understand that, as soon as a vehicle is stolen, generally, the number plate is removed from the vehicle, but vehicles all have identifying markets. Whether it&#8217;s three license discs up the windscreen or logo on the roof, or roof racks on the roof, or paint, missing [the] side mirror. All of those become opportunities for us to continue to add value to the access that our customers have.”</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/industry/collaboration-is-key-to-eradicating-crime-vumacam-coo-michael-varney/">Collaboration is key to eradicating crime &#8211; Vumacam COO Michael Varney</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRASA relocates trains to safety after JHB fire</title>
		<link>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/fire-and-safety/prasa-relocates-trains-to-safety-after-jhb-fire/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nivashni Nair]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 06:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fire and Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of Johannesburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire and safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prasa]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protectionweb.co.za/?p=94281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) has successfully relocated several locomotives and coaches to safety after a fire incident on the M1 bridge above the Braamfontein yard where coaches and locomotives are staged. The incident occurred in the early hours of Wednesday morning, prompting immediate response from PRASA Protection Services. “[The] City of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/fire-and-safety/prasa-relocates-trains-to-safety-after-jhb-fire/">PRASA relocates trains to safety after JHB fire</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) has successfully relocated several locomotives and coaches to safety after a fire incident on the M1 bridge above the Braamfontein yard where coaches and locomotives are staged.</p>



<p>The incident occurred in the early hours of Wednesday morning, prompting immediate response from PRASA Protection Services.</p>



<p>“[The] City of Johannesburg Emergency Management Services was dispatched to the scene, but despite their efforts, the fire persisted, necessitating swift action from PRASA Rail. Train crew members at home were promptly activated to move the locomotives and coaches to a safe location to prevent exposure to the fire.</p>



<p>“While the exact cause of the fire has not been confirmed, preliminary reports suggest that the fire may have originated from an underground tunnel housing cables belonging to City Power. The City Emergency Management Services have confirmed that the fire is now under control, with firefighting operations ongoing,” PRASA said.</p>



<p>No major damage has been reported on the coaches and locomotives, except minimal damage to the paint of a few locomotives and coaches due to heat exposure.</p>



<p>We will continue assessing the entire fleet that was relocated.</p>



<p>“At PRASA Rail, we acknowledge the seriousness of this incident, and we are taking every possible measure to ensure the ongoing safety and protection of our personnel and assets.</p>



<p>“We will continue to collaborate closely with the City’s Emergency Management Service throughout this process. Our team is actively monitoring the situation, and we will provide further updates as necessary,” the agency said.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/fire-and-safety/prasa-relocates-trains-to-safety-after-jhb-fire/">PRASA relocates trains to safety after JHB fire</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
