<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OUTA Archives - ProtectionWeb</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/tag/outa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/tag/outa/</link>
	<description>First with Security News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 07:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-ZA</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Sibiya and Tembisa Hospital tender mogul raids welcomed</title>
		<link>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/police/sibiya-and-tembisa-hospital-tender-mogul-raids-welcomed/</link>
					<comments>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/police/sibiya-and-tembisa-hospital-tender-mogul-raids-welcomed/#disqus_thread</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 07:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hangwani Maumela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadrack Sibiya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIU asset seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Investigating Unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tembisa Hospital]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protectionweb.co.za/?p=98775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) has noted two major law enforcement operations currently unfolding in South Africa: the raid on suspended Deputy National Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya’s home, and the Special Investigating Unit’s (SIU) asset seizures targeting Tembisa Hospital tender mogul Hangwani Maumela. These developments are stark evidence of how corruption continues to infect [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/police/sibiya-and-tembisa-hospital-tender-mogul-raids-welcomed/">Sibiya and Tembisa Hospital tender mogul raids welcomed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) has noted two major law enforcement operations currently unfolding in South Africa: the raid on suspended Deputy National Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya’s home, and the Special Investigating Unit’s (SIU) asset seizures targeting Tembisa Hospital tender mogul Hangwani Maumela.</p>
<p>These developments are stark evidence of how corruption continues to infect the state at every level, OUTA said. The Sibiya raid forms part of an investigation linked to the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry into criminality, political interference, and corruption in the criminal justice system. This commission, established following testimony by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, is probing allegations that criminal syndicates have infiltrated the South African Police Service (SAPS), the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), intelligence structures, and elements of the judiciary. These claims cut to the heart of South Africa’s law enforcement crisis, OUTA said. “When the police themselves are compromised, accountability becomes impossible.”</p>
<p>Separately, the SIU’s raids on Maumela’s properties, including his luxury Sandton mansion and a car dealership in Mpumalanga, mark what OUTA said is a major step in the investigation into the looting of Tembisa Hospital. The scandal, first exposed by murdered whistleblower Babita Deokaran, revealed how politically connected businesspeople siphoned more than R2 billion through irregular tenders, while the hospital itself struggled with medicine shortages and failing infrastructure.</p>
<p>“Together, these cases tell a single story,” said OUTA CEO Wayne Duvenage. “The rot is not confined to one department or one corrupt official. It runs from the procurement systems in many government departments and state entities that enrich undeserved companies and politically connected individuals, to the police structures that are supposed to hold them accountable. Until these networks are dismantled and the rule of law is allowed to flow unhindered, leading to prosecutions, South Africa remains trapped in a cycle of exposure without consequence.”</p>
<p>OUTA calls for urgent action to strengthen and capacitate the SIU, NPA, the Hawks, and the South African Revenue Service (SARS), ensuring they have both independence and capacity to pursue complex corruption cases to completion.</p>
<p>“Raids and asset seizures are a start. These specific matters currently unfolding are many years overdue and there, are there are thousands more to get to. To do so, South Africans deserve and need justice that goes beyond confiscations of a few high-profile cases. We need sustainable justice that is effective and restores public trust, protects whistleblowers, and proves that accountability is not selective,” OUTA concluded.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/police/sibiya-and-tembisa-hospital-tender-mogul-raids-welcomed/">Sibiya and Tembisa Hospital tender mogul raids welcomed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/police/sibiya-and-tembisa-hospital-tender-mogul-raids-welcomed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police the City of Joburg, not our CCTV cameras</title>
		<link>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/uncategorised/police-the-city-of-joburg-not-our-cctv-cameras/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricardo Teixeira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 07:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of Johannesburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protectionweb.co.za/?p=98197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) is going to court to challenge the legality of the City of Johannesburg (COJ) new by-law on privately owned closed-circuit television cameras (CCTV), which sets up convoluted rules requiring registration and City access to private data. OUTA’s case is against the City of Johannesburg, and the City’s municipal manager [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/uncategorised/police-the-city-of-joburg-not-our-cctv-cameras/">Police the City of Joburg, not our CCTV cameras</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span data-ogsc="" data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody">The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) is going to court to challenge the legality of the City of Johannesburg (COJ) new by-law on privately owned closed-circuit television cameras (CCTV), which sets up convoluted rules requiring registration and City access to private data.</p>
<p>OUTA’s case is against the City of Johannesburg, and the City’s municipal manager and mayor, and was filed in the Johannesburg High Court on 18 June. Currently the acting municipal manager is Tshepo Makola (since 17 January 2025) and the mayor is Dada Morero (since 16 August 2024). The papers have been served, and OUTA is awaiting an indication of whether the City intends to oppose the action.</p>
<p>The notice of motion calls for the court to declare the City’s <em data-ogsc="">Privately-Owned Closed-Circuit Television Surveillance Camera By Law</em> invalid and unconstitutional, and set it aside. It also calls for the City to provide the records relating to the public participation, adoption and promulgation of the by-law.</p>
<p>This by-law was passed by the City council on 21 February 2025, with the meeting minutes showing support from 15 parties (including the ANC, ActionSA, EFF and PA) and dissent by two parties (the DA and ACDP).</p>
<p>OUTA believes that the by-law is convoluted, irrational, places unreasonable burdens on private businesses and residents, raises privacy concerns, and is unworkable.</p>
<p><strong data-ogsc="">OUTA’s founding affidavit</strong></p>
<p>OUTA’s founding affidavit is by Advocate Stefanie Fick, OUTA Executive Director for the Accountability Division.</p>
<p>Fick says that OUTA wants the by-law overturned due to:</span></p>
<ul data-ogsc="">
<li data-ogsc=""><span data-ogsc="">Lack of public participation;</span></li>
<li data-ogsc=""><span data-ogsc="">Conflict with section 156 of the Constitution regarding the powers of municipalities;</span></li>
<li data-ogsc=""><span data-ogsc="">Lack of rationality;</span></li>
<li data-ogsc=""><span data-ogsc="">Infringement of the constitutional rights to property (section 25 of the Constitution), privacy (s14), and freedom and security (s12).</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span data-ogsc="">Fick says the public participation process is essential, and calls for the by-law to be declared invalid “for want of sufficient public participation”.</p>
<p>“Given the extent and impact of the By-Law, it appears that limited public participation took place, alternatively, that there was insufficient community participation,” says Fick.</p>
<p>OUTA questions the legality of the by-law, arguing that the City’s powers are limited by the Constitution and the South African Police Services Act, and these do not appear to allow a municipality to exercise direct authority over private property such as privately owned CCTV cameras. “The COJ may regulate its own CCTV camera systems as it deems fit, but it exceeds its powers by directly interfering with private property rights,” says Fick.</p>
<p>“It would appear that the COJ is usurping policing functions by commandeering private CCTV camera systems aimed at ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities and property within the City, which safety and security responsibility is primarily the function of National and Provincial Government. For this reason, the COJ is overstepping its executive and legislative authority.”</p>
<p>OUTA says the City’s registration process is irrational, cumbersome and unimplementable.</p>
<p>The by-law requires “prior written approval” from the City for installing, using or upgrading CCTV cameras which include coverage of public space, to provide the City with plans and motivations for such cameras, get sign-off from a registered engineer, reapply each year, and pay fees to the City. It also allows the City to simply confiscate without a court order any equipment it deems to have overstepped the by-law.</p>
<p>The by-law also requires that each CCTV camera must record and store data for a minimum period but this is incoherently stated and effectively outlaws cameras that provide only real-time monitoring.</p>
<p>The by-law blocks sharing of data with community policing forums or private security companies, restricting it to use by the SAPS and Johannesburg Metro Police Department (JMPD) only.</p>
<p>CCTV cameras must carry labels with owners’ names and contact details, which creates privacy issues.</p>
<p>There are additional restrictions for commercial applicants.</p>
<p>Fick calls the demand for fees “nothing more than a scheme to secure additional revenue for the COJ, which is financially crippled”, and a double tax for owners who have already paid VAT and probably import duties on their CCTV equipment.</p>
<p>OUTA believes this by-law will undermine community safety initiatives, which means the by-law will effectively have the opposite effect of what is intended.</p>
<p>The by-law appears to grant City officials the right to enter private property at any time to inspect the cameras, which is an invasion of privacy and open to abuse.</p>
<p>Threats to confiscate unregistered cameras or those of which the City does not approve would be arbitrary deprivation or expropriation without compensation, says OUTA.</p>
<p>The requirement that owners must simply hand over all data is unnecessary, as “far less intrusive alternatives” already exist in law, including the subpoena system for investigation and prosecution, or simply asking CCTV owners for help.</p>
<p>The registration requirements raise concerns over privacy, and the City’s handling of data and potential for misuse. If the City takes all footage with access to public space, it follows that much of that footage will also include images of private space. “What a person does within the boundaries of his property is private, and the COJ must not intrude on this privacy,” says Fick.</p>
<p>The by-law is unimplementable, and will not improve security.</p>
<p>“The exercise of public power must be rational and logically connected to the intended purpose,” says Fick. “It is contended that there is no rationality between the purpose and object of the act and the unreasonable burdens imposed on a CCTV owner.  Placing an enormous administrative burden on a CCTV owner would discourage residents from installing CCTV camera systems. The net result would be a community increasingly exposed to crime, where the SAPS and JMPD are not equipped to effectively deal with the scourge of pervasive crime.”</span></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/uncategorised/police-the-city-of-joburg-not-our-cctv-cameras/">Police the City of Joburg, not our CCTV cameras</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Africa’s fight against corruption: A budgetary betrayal</title>
		<link>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/opinion-and-analysis/south-africas-fight-against-corruption-a-budgetary-betrayal/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricardo Teixeira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 08:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Prosecuting Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South African Police Service]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protectionweb.co.za/?p=96463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) released in October 2024 disappointingly lacks a strong focus on addressing rampant corruption and dealing with criminal syndicates that lead to significant losses for the state. The Minister of Finance’s address sends a concerning message that the government is not taking the fight against corruption seriously, the Organisation Undoing [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/opinion-and-analysis/south-africas-fight-against-corruption-a-budgetary-betrayal/">South Africa’s fight against corruption: A budgetary betrayal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) released in October 2024 disappointingly lacks a strong focus on addressing rampant corruption and dealing with criminal syndicates that lead to significant losses for the state. The Minister of Finance’s address sends a concerning message that the government is not taking the fight against corruption seriously, the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) has said.</p>
<p>Instead of allocating additional funds to strengthen various elements of the criminal justice system, the MTBPS skirts around essential short-term strategies and long-term procurement reforms, and lacks concrete targets and enforcement measures.</p>
<p>OUTA is concerned about the dilution of direct anti-corruption efforts in this year’s budget. This is evident in the R174 million reduction to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) budget for salaries, against the backdrop of a R221 million (45%) increase in remuneration for Members of Parliament and a substantial additional R3.5 billion allocation for South Africa&#8217;s military involvement in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). &#8220;We are also concerned that the police have had R1.5 billion cut from salaries, mainly from administration, but also from visible policing and detectives,&#8221; OUTA said.</p>
<p>These budget amendments starkly contradict the principles of a Government of National Unity (GNU), founded on shared sacrifice and commitment to the public good. At a time when public trust hinges on responsible fiscal management and a clear dedication to combating corruption, prioritising significant pay increases for MPs appears disconnected from the pressing needs of South Africans.</p>
<p>OUTA believes that substantial increases in the budgets for key elements of the criminal justice system—such as the NPA, Special Investigating Unit (SIU), SARS administration, and the Public Protector—are long overdue. &#8220;We believe that a lack of attention to these areas, combined with a clear oversight strategy and corresponding structure with systems, will lead to an ongoing failure to address the accountability and oversight gaps that plague many government departments.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;While we support the move toward Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs), particularly Build Operate and Transfer (BOT) programmes, we have witnessed significant corruption and profit gouging in such agreements due to insufficient oversight and accountability.&#8221; OUTA warns that billions will be wasted through overpriced infrastructure tenders and poor workmanship which has become the norm in government infrastructure procurement programmes for far too long.</p>
<p>While the government’s National Anti-Corruption Strategy has been in development over the past four years, little is evident in transparent, measurable timelines and funding allocations for anti-corruption enforcement to curb corruption, fraud and criminality, which gives rise to billions of rand lost to the state each year. Without a proactive approach to implement concrete anti-corruption measures, fiscal stability will remain elusive, and South Africa risks further economic decline at the expense of its citizens’ welfare.</p>
<p>Adding to our concerns is the additional R5 billion allocated to Sanral, ostensibly for the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP) debt relief. However, this general allocation lacks transparency, raising questions about whether these funds will be used for targeted debt relief or merely perpetuate inefficiencies within this state-owned enterprise, OUTA said.</p>
<p>While OUTA welcomes Treasury’s plans to address debt-laden and mismanaged municipalities – somewhat focussed on Eskom’s municipal debt relief programmes – the acknowledgement that “many of our municipalities face serious governance, planning and financial management challenges”, is of little consequence if government continues to turn a blind eye to the lack of consequences and accountability for errant municipal management.</p>
<p>OUTA welcomes government’s intention to increase investment in bulk water, sanitation infrastructure and efficient water-management strategies, whilst also implementing a new water-pricing strategy. We note this comes on the back of a reduction of R225 million from the Department of Water and Sanitation Department’s vote, particularly the infrastructure grant, and can only read government’s intentions to tackle the water management crisis through their planned PPPs and BOT programmes. Should this be the case, OUTA believes these plans need to be done in conjunction with a revised strategy for the future management and control of wastewater treatment plants within local government, along with stringent oversight and procurement transparency processes.</p>
<p>OUTA remains steadfast in its commitment to protecting taxpayer resources and securing South Africa’s future. &#8220;We urge the government to prioritise fiscal responsibility and implement meaningful anti-corruption measures to restore public trust and ensure that all South Africans benefit from their contributions,&#8221; the organisation said.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/opinion-and-analysis/south-africas-fight-against-corruption-a-budgetary-betrayal/">South Africa’s fight against corruption: A budgetary betrayal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>OUTA wants Godongwana to allocate more funds for the criminal justice system</title>
		<link>https://www.protectionweb.co.za/civil-security/outa-wants-godongwana-to-allocate-more-funds-for-the-criminal-justice-system/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 09:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal justice system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enoch Godongwana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protectionweb.co.za/?p=96389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana announces South Africa’s Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) today, the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) has called for more funding allocated to the criminal justice system, including the South African Police Service (SAPS). “It is our desire to see the reduction of budgets in unnecessary spending areas such as [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/civil-security/outa-wants-godongwana-to-allocate-more-funds-for-the-criminal-justice-system/">OUTA wants Godongwana to allocate more funds for the criminal justice system</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana announces South Africa’s Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) today, the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) has called for more funding allocated to the criminal justice system, including the South African Police Service (SAPS).</p>
<p>“It is our desire to see the reduction of budgets in unnecessary spending areas such as VIP protection for ministers and blue-light brigades and, instead, to see more funds assigned to the various sectors within the criminal justice system such as the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), SAPS, Special Investigating Unit (SIU), SARS and institutions like the Public Protector and the Auditor-General,” OUTA said in a statement ahead of Godongwana’s budget speech.</p>
<p>“Across all fronts and levels of responsible leadership in South Africa, the issue of corruption and organised crime is commonly regarded as a crisis and a hindrance to economic growth, and yet we don’t get a sense that government is prioritising the spending of our limited resources wisely enough to address this crisis.”</p>
<p>Over the past five years, OUTA pointed out that the NPA’s budget has not grown sufficiently enough to address its need, moving from R4.009 billion in 2019/20 to R5.889 billion in 2024/25. While this is an increase of 47% over five years, this started from an extremely low base and the NPA faces a massive and complex workload with the entrenchment of corruption and the growth in organised crime. This is an entity which still needs rebuilding and strengthening with experts. The NPA underfunding becomes even more apparent when noting that its budget includes funding the Asset Forfeiture Unit (R824 million) and the Investigating Directorate (R939 million), key institutions in the battle against state capture and grand corruption.</p>
<p>“The NPA needs significant resources. We note that the VIP Protection Services receives R2.177 billion, which we believe is massively over-resourced at the expense of essentials such as the NPA,” OUTA said.</p>
<p>The organisation added that the SIU limps along with just R450 million a year, but must provide professional forensic investigating and litigation services to all state institutions. “In theory, those institutions pay for its services, however the reality is different. The Presidency spends more on administration (R533 million), and the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources spends massively more on Mining, Minerals and Energy Policy (R1.200 billion) despite the apparent ongoing failure of this policy.”</p>
<p>As for the police, OUTA said the SAPS needs help, not necessarily more money although extra police on the street are always welcome, but a strategy for addressing the dysfunction that left South Africa with a police service utterly unable to respond to the July 2021 violence, and only slowly now starting to regard extortion – an aspect of organised crime – as a crime.</p>
<p>“This overhaul needs building into the medium-term strategy, and should include a strategy addressing the very expensive and failed Crime Intelligence unit (6 074 officers) and the well-padded Protection and Security Services (8 801 officers). Compare these staffing numbers to the SANDF’s Maritime Defence (5 870 staff) and Defence Intelligence (1 055 staff), or the NPA (6 618 staff).”</p>
<p>The limited resources for the Public Protector, OUTA said, sends a clear message of disrespect for the protection of the public from the abuse of authority. “The Public Protector receives a miniscule R352 million, which means it is unable to increase its staff complement as it would like to do.”</p>
<p>OUTA said it believes that for every R1 billion invested in effective rebuilding of structures that drive a concerted effort in the fight against corruption, South Africa could see ten times that amount as a return in higher tax collections, in more excise duties by challenging illicit trading, and in improved business confidence which will result in the growth of tax revenue and employment.</p>
<p>“It makes so much sense for the Minister of Finance to beef up all areas that tackle improved transparency and accountability, in order to begin to restore social justice and grow the economy,” said Wayne Duvenage, OUTA CEO.</p>
<p>“We hope to see more measured steps being taken to control the use of the equitable share grant funding to municipalities, with stricter consequences for failed service delivery, and ensuring that the funds don’t merely flow into the hands of corrupt syndicates.”</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za/civil-security/outa-wants-godongwana-to-allocate-more-funds-for-the-criminal-justice-system/">OUTA wants Godongwana to allocate more funds for the criminal justice system</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.protectionweb.co.za">ProtectionWeb</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
